Attribution And The (Non-)Alignment Of Syntactic And Discourse Arguments Of Connectives
نویسندگان
چکیده
The annotations of the Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) include (1) discourse connectives and their arguments, and (2) attribution of each argument of each connective and of the relation it denotes. Because the PDTB covers the same text as the Penn TreeBank WSJ corpus, syntactic and discourse annotation can be compared. This has revealed significant differences between syntactic structure and discourse structure, in terms of the arguments of connectives, due in large part to attribution. We describe these differences, an algorithm for detecting them, and finally some experimental results. These results have implications for automating discourse annotation based on syntactic annotation.
منابع مشابه
Anaphoric arguments of discourse connectives: Semantic properties of antecedents versus non-antecedents
We have argued extensively in prior work that discourse connectives can be analyzed as encoding predicate-argument relations whose arguments derived from the interpretation of discourse units. All adverbial connectives we have analyzed to date have expressed binary relations. But they are special in taking one of their two arguments structurally, and the other, anaphorically. As such, interpret...
متن کاملComputing Discourse Semantics: The Predicate-Argument Semantics of Discourse Connectives in D-LTAG
Abstract. D-LTAG is a discourse-level extension of Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar (LTAG), in which discourse syntax is projected by different types of discourse connectives and discourse interpretation is a product of compositional rules, anaphora resolution, and inference. In this paper, we present a D-LTAG extension of ongoing work on an LTAG syntaxsemantic interface. First, we show how p...
متن کاملAnnotating Discourse Connectives In The Chinese Treebank
In this paper we examine the issues that arise from the annotation of the discourse connectives for the Chinese Discourse Treebank Project. This project is based on the same principles as the PDTB, a project that annotates the English discourse connectives in the Penn Treebank. The paper begins by outlining range of discourse connectives under consideration in this project and examines the dist...
متن کاملComplexity of Dependencies in Discourse: Are Dependencies in Discourse More Complex than in Syntax?
This paper investigates the complexity of dependencies at the discourse level, in particular the dependencies between discourse connectives and their arguments. Our study is based on data from the Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) and is therefore an exploration into the ways treebanks can inform linguistic issues. We observe that, unlike in syntax, there is more uncertainty and flexibility with r...
متن کاملExperiments on Sense Annotations and Sense Disambiguation of Discourse Connectives
Discourse connectives can be analyzed as discourse level predicates which project predicate-argument structure on a par with verbs at the sentence level. The Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) reflects this view in its design providing annotation of the discourse connectives and their arguments. Like verbs, discourse connectives have multiple senses. We present a set of manual sense annotation stud...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005